86.New courses initiated as Dean
New courses
play an important role in the growth of
higher educational institutions. When new courses are
started, more opportunities for promotion of teaching and non-teaching
staff will automatically be generated.
Additional buildings for lecture
classes and laboratories and additional
equipment will be available. With the introduction
of new courses, sometimes new challenges
may have to be taken up too. Of
course, there can be difference
of opinion among the faculty on the
choice of the area
of specialization.
As part of academic administration, two academic bodies were
formed to prepare the material for discussion in the senate. Board for Undergraduate Studies (BUGS) for B.Tech courses
and Board for Postgraduate
Studies (BPGS) for the M.Tech,
MCA and PhD programmes. Dean (UG) was
the Chairman of BUGS and Dean(PG& SR) Chairman of BPGS. The proposal for
the post graduate course prepared by the
department is discussed in detail
in the BPGS before
presentation in the senate. Curriculum and syllabi discussed and approved here
in several sittings of the BPGS. After these preliminary work only, the proposal is presented
in the Senate for final approval and acceptance.
As mentioned
briefly, emphasis was on starting
new M.Tech programmes in engineering
departments. Engineering departments
prepared proposal based on the
expertise available in their respective
departments. These were to include the recent developments in the different branches. Very little
difference of opinion was apparent in
these. But, coming to the proposed Masters
programmes in the Science departments, clearly there were two
strong opinions arose. One was to start
post graduate programmes similar to those available in the Kerala, Calicut and M.G.Universities in the state
and another to start special course unique to
other institutions of higher
learning like I.I.T with emphasis
on emerging areas of applied
sciences. The Director and myself
were of the opinion that the course offered by N.I.T should have a stamp of its own and should not be a ‘run of the mill’
courses. We were of the opinion that we should start M.Sc(Tech) courses
of three years duration instead of the usual two-year M.Sc
courses available in other universities. However, members of faculty
in the departments of Physics and Chemistry were
for starting conventional
courses, mainly for reasons for ease of teaching. M.Sc(Tech) courses could
be like the integrated M.SC(Tech)
courses available in I.I.Ts. Mathematics
department was ready as they had been teaching engineering mathematics for the B.Tech and M.Tech
courses already for several years. However, teachers in the science departments were teaching mostly in
the first and second years of the B.Tech courses and were sceptical
about these new format courses. After prolonged
discussions, we decided to
start three-year M.Sc(Tech) course in Materials Science in Physics
department and Polymer Science in
Chemistry department. However, it is
learnt that recently these courses
have been converted to the conventional type courses available in other universities in the state.
Anyway, during
the three years I was Dean (PG&SR), with advice from the
two Directors and
cooperation of the colleagues in the different
departments, we could start
one more
M.Tech course in all
the engineering departments and
three M.Sc(Tech) programmes in the Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry. This is something
I look back with gratification. Further, the
Ordnances and Regulations for
M.Tech and PhD courses were
also thoroughly revised so that the
quality of the courses
could be enhanced by stipulating conditions for satisfactory progress and
ultimate submission of the PhD theses.
Comments
Post a Comment